Moving mesh cosmology: characteristics of galaxies and haloes

TL;DR

This study compares moving-mesh and SPH hydrodynamical simulation methods, revealing that the moving-mesh approach produces galaxies with higher star formation rates, larger sizes, and more realistic gaseous structures.

Contribution

It provides a direct comparison between moving-mesh and SPH methods, demonstrating the advantages of the moving-mesh code AREPO in galaxy formation simulations.

Findings

Higher star formation rates in massive haloes with AREPO

Galaxies have larger sizes and higher angular momentum in AREPO

More extended and smoother gaseous disks in AREPO

Abstract

We discuss cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy formation performed with the new moving-mesh code AREPO, which promises higher accuracy compared with the traditional SPH technique that has been widely employed for this problem. We use an identical set of physics in corresponding simulations carried out with the well-tested SPH code GADGET, adopting also the same high-resolution gravity solver. We are thus able to compare both simulation sets on an object-by-object basis, allowing us to cleanly isolate the impact of different hydrodynamical methods on galaxy and halo properties. In accompanying papers, we focus on an analysis of the global baryonic statistics predicted by the simulation codes, (Vogelsberger et al. 2011) and complementary idealized simulations that highlight the differences between the hydrodynamical schemes (Sijacki et al. 2011). Here we investigate their influence on the baryonic properties of simulated galaxies and their surrounding haloes. We find that AREPO leads to significantly higher star formation rates for galaxies in massive haloes and to more extended gaseous disks in galaxies, which also feature a thinner and smoother morphology than their GADGET counterparts. Consequently, galaxies formed in AREPO have larger sizes and higher specific angular momentum than their SPH correspondents. The more efficient cooling flows in AREPO yield higher densities and lower entropies in halo centers (and the opposite trend in halo outskirts) leading to higher star formation rates of massive galaxies. While both codes agree to acceptable accuracy on a number of baryonic properties of cosmic structures, our results clearly demonstrate that galaxy formation simulations greatly benefit from the use of more accurate hydrodynamical techniques such as AREPO.