The stellar activity-rotation relationship and the evolution of stellar dynamos
Nicholas J. Wright, Jeremy J. Drake, Eric E. Mamajek, and Gregory W., Henry

TL;DR
This study analyzes the relationship between stellar rotation and activity across 824 stars, revealing a steeper power law slope than previously thought, and explores the implications for stellar dynamo evolution and magnetic activity regimes.
Contribution
It provides a new estimate of the rotation-activity relationship slope, challenges the canonical value, and investigates the dynamo mechanisms and thresholds for stellar activity saturation.
Findings
The power law slope .70, steeper than the canonical .
Differential rotation declines as stars spin down, following rac{ ext{d}\, ext{ extOmega}}{ ext{ extOmega}} = ext{ extOmega}^{0.7}.
Late F-type stars do not pass through the saturated regime, transitioning directly from super-saturated to unsaturated X-ray emission.
Abstract
We present a sample of 824 solar and late-type stars with X-ray luminosities and rotation periods. This is used to study the relationship between rotation and stellar activity and derive a new estimate of the convective turnover time. From an unbiased subset of this sample the power law slope of the unsaturated regime, L_X / L_bol = Ro^\beta, is fit as \beta = -2.70 +/- 0.13. This is inconsistent with the canonical \beta=-2 slope to a confidence of 5 sigma, and argues for an additional term in the dynamo number equation. From a simple scaling analysis this implies \Delta\Omega / \Omega = \Omega^0.7, i.e. the differential rotation of solar-type stars gradually declines as they spin down. Super-saturation is observed for the fastest rotators in our sample and its parametric dependencies are explored. Significant correlations are found with both the corotation radius and the excess polar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
