Disentangling dark energy and cosmic tests of gravity from weak lensing systematics
Istvan Laszlo, Rachel Bean, Donnacha Kirk, Sarah Bridle

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how astrophysical and measurement systematics affect constraints on dark energy and gravity modifications from upcoming large-scale structure surveys, emphasizing the importance of modeling and cross-correlations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the impact of systematics on cosmological constraints and offers a fitting function for the matter power spectrum in modified gravity models.
Findings
Systematic uncertainties can reduce constraints by a factor of four.
Cross-correlations help recover constraining power.
Constraints are maintained if fewer than 36 parameters describe systematics.
Abstract
We consider the impact of key astrophysical and measurement systematics on constraints on dark energy and modifications to gravity on cosmic scales. We focus on upcoming photometric "Stage III" and "Stage IV" large scale structure surveys such as DES, SuMIRe, Euclid, LSST and WFIRST. We illustrate the different redshift dependencies of gravity modifications compared to intrinsic alignments, the main astrophysical systematic. The way in which systematic uncertainties, such as galaxy bias and intrinsic alignments, are modelled can change dark energy equation of state and modified gravity figures of merit by a factor of four. The inclusion of cross-correlations of cosmic shear and galaxy position measurements helps reduce the loss of constraining power from the lensing shear surveys. When forecasts for Planck CMB and Stage IV surveys are combined, constraints on the dark energy equation of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
