Depth Requirements for a Tonne-scale 76Ge Neutrinoless Double-beta Decay Experiment
The MAJORANA Collaboration: E. Aguayo, F. T. Avignone III, H. O. Back,, A. S. Barabash, M. Bergevin, F. E. Bertrand, M. Boswell, V. Brudanin, M., Busch, Y-D. Chan, C. D. Christofferson, J. I. Collar, D. C. Combs, R. J., Cooper, J. A. Detwiler, P. J. Doe, Yu. Efremenko, V. Egorov

TL;DR
This paper assesses the depth underground needed for a large-scale 76Ge neutrinoless double-beta decay experiment to minimize cosmic-ray backgrounds, highlighting the importance of shielding and site depth in achieving sensitivity goals.
Contribution
It provides a Monte Carlo-based analysis of the overburden requirements for a tonne-scale experiment with different shielding configurations, emphasizing the impact of background uncertainties.
Findings
A depth of >~5200 mwe is needed with a compact shield for desired sensitivity.
Shielding type significantly influences the required underground depth.
Operation of existing detectors will help reduce background uncertainties.
Abstract
Neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments can potentially determine the Majorana or Dirac nature of the neutrino, and aid in understanding the neutrino absolute mass scale and hierarchy. Future 76Ge-based searches target a half-life sensitivity of >10^27 y to explore the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy. Reaching this sensitivity will require a background rate of <1 count tonne^-1 y^-1 in a 4-keV-wide spectral region of interest surrounding the Q value of the decay. We investigate the overburden required to reach this background goal in a tonne-scale experiment with a compact (copper and lead) shield based on Monte Carlo calculations of cosmic-ray background rates. We find that, in light of the presently large uncertainties in these types of calculations, a site with an underground depth >~5200 mwe is required for a tonne-scale experiment with a compact shield similar to the planned…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
