On the viability of gravitational Bose-Einstein condensates as alternatives to supermassive black holes
A. A. Hujeirat

TL;DR
This paper critically examines supermassive Bose-Einstein condensates as alternatives to black holes, highlighting causality issues, stability problems, and the likelihood of collapse into black holes, thus favoring traditional black hole models.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of SMBEC viability, identifying fundamental physical and stability challenges that undermine their potential as black hole alternatives.
Findings
SMBECs face causality constraints preventing growth to quasar masses
Rotating superfluid cores are unstable to non-axisymmetric perturbations
Core turbulence likely leads to collapse into black holes
Abstract
Black holes are inevitable mathematical outcome of spacetime-energy coupling in general relativity. Currently these objects are of vital importance for understanding numerous phenomena in astrophysics and cosmology. However, neither theory nor observations have been capable of unequivocally prove the existence of black holes or granting us an insight of what their internal structures could look like, therefore leaving researchers to speculate about their nature. In this paper the reliability of supermassive Bose-Einstein condensates (henceforth SMBECs) as alternative to supermassive black holes is examined. Such condensates are found to suffer of a causality problem that terminates their cosmological growth toward acquiring masses typical for quasars and triggers their self-collapse into supermassive black holes (SMBHs). It is argued that a SMBEC-core most likely would be subject…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
