
TL;DR
This paper offers a detailed classification of observation types in physics, clarifying how different observational processes relate to quantum and classical measurements, emphasizing the role of control, invasiveness, and relational properties.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive framework for understanding observation in physics, integrating classical, quantum, and intermediate properties through a classification based on control, invasiveness, and relational aspects.
Findings
Observation can be non-invasive or invasive, involving creation or destruction.
Quantum measurements involve product tests, leading to probabilistic outcomes.
Observations can target intrinsic, relational, or intermediate properties.
Abstract
Founding our analysis on the Geneva-Brussels approach to the foundations of physics, we provide a clarification and classification of the key concept of observation. An entity can be observed with or without a scope. In the second case, the observation is a purely non-invasive discovery process; in the first case, it is a purely invasive process, which can involve either creation or destruction aspects. An entity can also be observed with or without a full control over the observational process. In the latter case, the observation can be described by a symmetry breaking mechanism, through which a specific deterministic observational process is selected among a number of potential ones, as explained in Aerts' hidden measurement approach. This is what is called a product test, or product observation, whose consequences are that outcomes can only be predicted in probabilistic terms, as it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
