Moving mesh cosmology: the hydrodynamics of galaxy formation
Debora Sijacki (1), Mark Vogelsberger (1), Dusan Keres (2), Volker, Springel (3), Lars Hernquist (1) ((1) Harvard/CfA, (2) UC Berkeley, (3), HITS)

TL;DR
This paper compares the moving-mesh code AREPO with the SPH code GADGET, revealing that AREPO provides more accurate and physically reliable results in galaxy formation simulations by better handling fluid instabilities and gas dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed comparison between AREPO and GADGET, highlighting the advantages of moving-mesh hydrodynamics over traditional SPH methods in cosmological simulations.
Findings
AREPO better captures fluid instabilities and mixing.
GADGET underestimates vorticity and suppresses entropy generation.
Galaxy disk formation is more realistic in AREPO simulations.
Abstract
We present a detailed comparison between the well-known SPH code GADGET and the new moving-mesh code AREPO on a number of hydrodynamical test problems. Through a variety of numerical experiments we establish a clear link between test problems and systematic numerical effects seen in cosmological simulations of galaxy formation. Our tests demonstrate deficiencies of the SPH method in several sectors. These accuracy problems not only manifest themselves in idealized hydrodynamical tests, but also propagate to more realistic simulation setups of galaxy formation, ultimately affecting gas properties in the full cosmological framework, as highlighted in papers by Vogelsberger et al. (2011) and Keres et al. (2011). We find that an inadequate treatment of fluid instabilities in GADGET suppresses entropy generation by mixing, underestimates vorticity generation in curved shocks and prevents…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
