Testing Scaling Relations for Solar-Like Oscillations from the Main Sequence to Red Giants using Kepler Data
D. Huber, T. R. Bedding, D. Stello, S. Hekker, S. Mathur, B. Mosser,, G. A. Verner, A. Bonanno, D. L. Buzasi, T. L. Campante, Y. P. Elsworth, S. J., Hale, T. Kallinger, V. Silva Aguirre, W. J. Chaplin, J. De Ridder, R. A., Garcia, T. Appourchaux, S. Frandsen, G. Houdek

TL;DR
This study tests and refines asteroseismic scaling relations across a wide range of stellar types using Kepler data, revealing the need for revised models to accurately predict oscillation amplitudes and exploring stellar activity effects.
Contribution
It introduces a revised amplitude scaling relation with separate luminosity-mass dependence and investigates the impact of stellar activity on oscillation amplitudes.
Findings
Revised amplitude scaling relation achieves ~25% precision across stellar types.
Difference in Delta_nu-nu_max relation explained by temperature and mass distributions.
Evidence of amplitude suppression linked to stellar activity, especially in subgiants.
Abstract
We have analyzed solar-like oscillations in ~1700 stars observed by the Kepler Mission, spanning from the main-sequence to the red clump. Using evolutionary models, we test asteroseismic scaling relations for the frequency of maximum power (nu_max), the large frequency separation (Delta_nu) and oscillation amplitudes. We show that the difference of the Delta_nu-nu_max relation for unevolved and evolved stars can be explained by different distributions in effective temperature and stellar mass, in agreement with what is expected from scaling relations. For oscillation amplitudes, we show that neither (L/M)^s scaling nor the revised scaling relation by Kjeldsen & Bedding (2011) are accurate for red-giant stars, and demonstrate that a revised scaling relation with a separate luminosity-mass dependence can be used to calculate amplitudes from the main-sequence to red-giants to a precision…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
