Confronting theoretical models with the observed evolution of the galaxy population out to z=4

TL;DR

This study compares semi-analytic galaxy formation models with high-redshift observations, revealing strengths and limitations in reproducing galaxy counts, redshift distributions, and luminosity functions up to z=4, and highlighting the impact of stellar population synthesis choices.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison between galaxy formation models and observations, emphasizing the effects of different stellar population synthesis codes on predicted galaxy properties.

Findings

Models reproduce B, i, J counts well but overpredict at longer wavelengths.

Including TP-AGB emission improves high-redshift galaxy predictions.

Luminosity functions match observations up to z~3, with discrepancies at lower luminosities.

Abstract

[abridged] We construct lightcones for the semi-analytic galaxy formation simulation of Guo et al. (2011) and make mock catalogues for comparison with deep high-redshift surveys. Photometric properties are calculated with two different stellar population synthesis codes (Bruzual & Charlot 2003; Maraston 2005) in order to study sensitivity to this aspect of the modelling. The catalogues are publicly available and include photometry for a large number of observed bands from 4000{\deg}A to 6{\mu}m, as well as rest-frame photometry and intrinsic properties of the galaxies. Guo et al. (2011) tuned their model to fit the low-redshift galaxy population but noted that at z > 1 it overpredicts the abundance of galaxies below the "knee" of the stellar mass function. Here we extend the comparison to deep galaxy counts in the B, i, J, K and IRAC 3.6{\mu}m, 4.5{\mu}m and 5.8{\mu}m bands, to the redshift distributions of K and 5.8{\mu}m selected galaxies, and to the evolution of rest-frame luminosity functions in the B and K bands. The B, i and J counts are well reproduced, but at longer wavelengths the overabundant high-redshift galaxies produce excess faint counts. The predicted redshift distributions for K and 5.8{\mu}m selected samples highlight the effect of emission from thermally pulsing AGB stars. The full treatment of Maraston (2005) predicts three times as many z~2 galaxies in faint 5.8{\mu}m selected samples as the model of Bruzual & Charlot (2003), whereas the two models give similar predictions for K-band selected samples. Although luminosity functions are adequately reproduced out to z~3 in rest-frame B, the same is true at rest-frame K only if TP-AGB emission is included, and then only at high luminosity. Fainter than L* the two synthesis models agree but overpredict the number of galaxies, another reflection of the overabundance of ~10^10M\odot model galaxies at z > 1.