Accretion of Saturn's mid-sized moons during the viscous spreading of young massive rings: solving the paradox of silicate-poor rings versus silicate-rich moons
S\'ebastien Charnoz, Aur\'elien Crida, Julie C. Castillo-Rogez, Valery, Lainey, Luke Dones, \"Ozg\"ur Karatekin, Gabriel Tobie, Stephane Mathis,, Christophe Le Poncin-Lafitte, Julien Salmon

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Saturn's mid-sized moons could have formed from the viscous spreading of massive, icy rings, explaining their current positions, compositions, and geological activity through a new accretion model.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid model demonstrating that mid-sized moons formed from icy ring debris, accounting for their locations and silicate content, and links their origin to ring formation over 2.5 billion years ago.
Findings
Moons can form from massive icy rings within a hybrid accretion model.
High dissipation within Saturn is needed to match current moon positions.
Silicate chunks could be embedded in moons, explaining compositional differences.
Abstract
The origin of Saturn's inner mid-sized moons (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione and Rhea) and Saturn's rings is debated. Charnoz et al. (2010) introduced the idea that the smallest inner moons could form from the spreading of the rings' edge while Salmon et al. (2010) showed that the rings could have been initially massive, and so was the ring's progenitor itself. One may wonder if the mid-sized moons may have formed also from the debris of a massive ring progenitor, as also suggested in Canup (2010). However, the process driving mid-sized moons accretion from the icy debris disks has not been investigated in details. In particular, this process does not seem able to explain the varying silicate contents of the mid-sized moons (from 6% to 57% in mass). Here, we explore the formation of large objects from a massive ice-rich ring (a few times Rhea's mass) and describe the fundamental…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
