The space density and X-ray luminosity function of non-magnetic cataclysmic variables
Magaretha L. Pretorius, Christian Knigge

TL;DR
This study combines two X-ray surveys to estimate the space density and luminosity function of non-magnetic cataclysmic variables, revealing potential undercounting of faint populations and constraining the luminosity distribution.
Contribution
It provides the first combined measurement of the space density and luminosity function of non-magnetic CVs using flux-limited surveys, accounting for statistical uncertainties and biases.
Findings
Estimated space density: 4^{+6}_{-2} imes 10^{-6} pc^{-3}
Luminosity function follows a truncated power law with index -0.80 1
Possible underestimation of faint CV populations by current surveys
Abstract
We combine two complete, X-ray flux-limited surveys, the ROSAT Bright Survey (RBS) and the ROSAT North Ecliptic Pole (NEP) survey, to measure the space density (\rho) and X-ray luminosity function (\Phi) of non-magnetic CVs. The combined survey has a flux limit of F_X \ga 1.1 \times 10^{-12} erg cm^{-2}s^{-1} over most of its solid angle of just over 2\pi, but is as deep as \simeq 10^{-14} erg cm^{-2}s^{-1} over a small area. The CV sample that we construct from these two surveys contains 20 non-magnetic systems. We carefully include all sources of statistical error in calculating \rho and \Phi by using Monte Carlo simulations; the most important uncertainty proves to be the often large errors in distances estimates. If we assume that the 20 CVs in the combined RBS and NEP survey sample are representative of the intrinsic population, the space density of non-magnetic CVs is 4^{+6}_{-2}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
