The borderlines of the invisibility and visibility for Calderon's inverse problem
Kari Astala, Matti Lassas, Lassi Paivarinta

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of detectability and invisibility in Calderon's inverse conductivity problem, identifying the precise boundary between conductivities that can be uniquely reconstructed and those that can cloak or create illusions.
Contribution
It establishes the borderline conditions for conductivity invisibility and visibility, including the existence of electric holograms that challenge uniqueness in inverse problems.
Findings
Identified the boundary between visible and cloaking conductivities.
Discovered electric holograms that create illusions and challenge uniqueness.
Provided new counterexamples related to invisibility cloaking.
Abstract
We consider the determination of a conductivity function in a two-dimensional domain from the Cauchy data of the solutions of the conductivity equation on the boundary. We prove uniqueness results for this inverse problem, posed by Calderon, for conductivities that are degenerate, that is, they may not be bounded from above or below. In particular, for scalar conductivities we solve the inverse problem in a class which is larger than . Also, we give new counterexamples for the uniqueness of the inverse conductivity problem. We say that a conductivity is visible if the inverse problem is solvable so that the inside of the domain can be uniquely determined, up to a change of coordinates, using the boundary measurements. The present counterexamples for the inverse problem have been related to the invisibility cloaking. This means that there are conductivities for which a part…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
