The Polarization Properties of Inverse Compton Emission and Implications for Blazar Observations with the GEMS X-Ray Polarimeter
Henric Krawczynski (Washington University in St. Louis)

TL;DR
This paper develops a formalism for calculating the polarization of inverse Compton emission, compares numerical and analytical results, and discusses implications for X-ray polarimetry of blazars with the GEMS mission.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive numerical formalism for polarization calculations in inverse Compton scattering, applicable in Thomson and Klein-Nishina regimes, and analyzes its implications for blazar observations.
Findings
Numerical results agree with earlier analytical calculations in the Thomson regime.
The formalism enables detailed polarization predictions for synchrotron self-Compton emission.
Future GEMS observations can distinguish emission mechanisms in blazars.
Abstract
NASA's Small Explorer Mission GEMS (Gravity and Extreme Magnetism SMEX), scheduled for launch in 2014, will have the sensitivity to detect and measure the linear polarization properties of the 0.5 keV and 2-10 keV X-ray emission of a considerable number of galactic and extragalactic sources. The prospect of sensitive X-ray polarimetry justifies a closer look at the polarization properties of the basic emission mechanisms. In this paper, we present analytical and numerical calculations of the linear polarization properties of inverse Compton scattered radiation. We describe a generally applicable formalism that can be used to numerically compute the polarization properties in the Thomson and Klein-Nishina regimes. We use the code to perform for the first time a detailed comparison of numerical results and the earlier analytical results derived by Bonometto et al. (1970) for scatterings…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
