Examining student ability to interpret and use potential energy diagrams for classical systems
Brian M. Stephanik, Peter S. Shaffer

TL;DR
This study investigates how well students can interpret potential energy diagrams for classical systems, revealing common difficulties in relating graphs to physical quantities and real-world systems, with implications for physics education.
Contribution
It provides new insights into students' misconceptions and challenges in understanding potential energy graphs, highlighting areas for improved instruction in physics courses.
Findings
Many students struggle to relate potential energy graphs to real-world systems.
Students have difficulty interpreting graphs of potential energy as other quantities.
Challenges persist even at advanced levels of physics education.
Abstract
The Physics Education Group at the University of Washington is examining the extent to which students are able to use graphs of potential energy vs. position to infer kinematic and dynamic quantities for a system. The findings indicate that many students have difficulty in relating the graphs to real-world systems. Some problems seem to be graphical in nature (e.g., interpreting graphs of potential energy vs. position as graphs of position vs. time). Others involve relating the graphs to total, kinetic, and potential energies, especially when the potential energy is negative. The results have implications beyond the introductory level since graphs of potential energy are used in advanced courses on classical and quantum mechanics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
