Mach Number Dependence of Turbulent Magnetic Field Amplification: Solenoidal versus Compressive Flows
Christoph Federrath (1, 2), Gilles Chabrier (1, 3), Jennifer, Schober (2), Robi Banerjee (4), Ralf S. Klessen (2), Dominik R. G. Schleicher, (5) ((1) Lyon, (2) Heidelberg, (3) Exeter, (4) Hamburg, (5) Goettingen)

TL;DR
This study investigates how Mach number influences turbulent magnetic field amplification in magnetohydrodynamical simulations, revealing differences in growth, saturation, and geometry between solenoidal and compressive flows across subsonic to supersonic regimes.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of magnetic dynamo efficiency and characteristics in solenoidal versus compressive turbulence across a wide Mach number range.
Findings
Magnetic amplification decreases at the transition from subsonic to supersonic flows due to shocks.
Solenoidal forcing results in more efficient dynamo action than compressive forcing.
Magnetic field geometries and saturation levels vary significantly with Mach number and forcing type.
Abstract
We study the growth rate and saturation level of the turbulent dynamo in magnetohydrodynamical simulations of turbulence, driven with solenoidal (divergence-free) or compressive (curl-free) forcing. For models with Mach numbers ranging from 0.02 to 20, we find significantly different magnetic field geometries, amplification rates, and saturation levels, decreasing strongly at the transition from subsonic to supersonic flows, due to the development of shocks. Both extreme types of turbulent forcing drive the dynamo, but solenoidal forcing is more efficient, because it produces more vorticity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
