UV-continuum slopes at z~4-7 from the HUDF09+ERS+CANDELS observations: Discovery of a well-defined UV-color magnitude relationship for z>=4 star-forming galaxies
R. J. Bouwens (Leiden), G. D. Illingworth (UC Santa Cruz), P. A. Oesch, (UC Santa Cruz), M. Franx (Leiden), I. Labbe (Leiden), M. Trenti (Boulder),, P. van Dokkum (Yale), C. M. Carollo (ETH Zurich), V. Gonzalez (UC Santa, Cruz), R. Smit (Leiden), D. Magee (UC Santa Cruz)

TL;DR
This study measures the UV-continuum slopes of high-redshift star-forming galaxies, revealing a consistent UV color-magnitude relationship that informs dust extinction and star formation rate evolution from z~4 to z~7.
Contribution
It provides the first well-defined UV color-magnitude relationship at z≥4, with minimal bias in beta measurements, and clarifies the role of dust in galaxy evolution during early cosmic times.
Findings
UV color-magnitude relationship becomes bluer at lower luminosities
Dust extinction is negligible at low luminosities and high redshifts
Results align star formation rate density with stellar mass density estimates
Abstract
Ultra-deep ACS and WFC3/IR HUDF+HUDF09 data, along with the wide-area GOODS+ERS+CANDELS data over the CDF-S GOODS field, are used to measure UV colors, expressed as the UV-continuum slope beta, of star-forming galaxies over a wide range in luminosity (0.1L*(z=3) to 2L*(z=3)) at high redshift (z~7 to z~4). Beta is measured using all ACS and WFC3/IR passbands uncontaminated by Ly_alpha and spectral breaks. Extensive tests show that our beta measurements are only subject to minimal biases. Using a different selection procedure, Dunlop et al. recently found large biases in their beta measurements. To reconcile these different results, we simulated both approaches and found that beta measurements for faint sources are subject to large biases if the same passbands are used both to select the sources and to measure beta. High-redshift galaxies show a well-defined rest-frame UV color-magnitude…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
