Photometric selection of Type Ia supernovae in the Supernova Legacy Survey
G. Bazin, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, J. Rich, E., Aubourg, P. Astier, C. Balland, S. Basa, R. G. Carlberg, A. Conley, D., Fouchez, J. Guy, D. Hardin, I. M. Hook, D. A. Howell, R. Pain, K. Perrett, C., J. Pritchet, N. Regnault, M. Sullivan, N. Fourmanoit

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a method to identify Type Ia supernovae using photometric data alone, enabling larger and deeper samples for cosmological studies without relying on spectroscopic confirmation.
Contribution
The study introduces a photometric selection technique for high-redshift SNe Ia that reaches deeper magnitudes and estimates contamination, facilitating future large-scale cosmological surveys.
Findings
Sample of 485 photometrically identified SNe Ia candidates.
Contamination by other supernova types estimated at 4%.
Results consistent with previous Monte Carlo bias corrections.
Abstract
We present a sample of 485 photometrically identified Type Ia supernova candidates mined from the first three years of data of the CFHT SuperNova Legacy Survey (SNLS). The images were submitted to a deferred processing independent of the SNLS real-time detection pipeline. Light curves of all transient events were reconstructed in the g_M, r_M, i_M and z_M filters and submitted to automated sequential cuts in order to identify possible supernovae. Pure noise and long-term variable events were rejected by light curve shape criteria. Type Ia supernova identification relied on event characteristics fitted to their light curves assuming the events to be normal SNe Ia. The light curve fitter SALT2 was used for this purpose, assigning host galaxy photometric redshifts to the tested events. The selected sample of 485 candidates is one magnitude deeper than that allowed by the SNLS spectroscopic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
