Very Strong Emission-Line Galaxies in the WISP Survey and Implications for High-Redshift Galaxies
H. Atek, B. Siana, C. Scarlata, M. Malkan, P. McCarthy, H. Teplitz, A., Henry, J. Colbert, C. Bridge, A. J. Bunker, A. Dressler, R. Fosbury, N. P., Hathi, C. Martin, N. R. Ross, and H. Shim

TL;DR
This study identifies a population of very strong emission-line galaxies across a broad redshift range, highlighting their impact on galaxy property estimates and implications for high-redshift galaxy surveys.
Contribution
It presents a large sample of strong emission-line galaxies from WISP, analyzes their properties, and demonstrates how emission lines affect galaxy mass and age estimates.
Findings
176 strong emission-line galaxies identified between z=0.35 and 2.3
Emission lines can cause overestimation of galaxy mass and age by up to a factor of 10
Strong emission lines can mimic high-redshift galaxy colors, affecting survey interpretations.
Abstract
The WFC3 Infrared Spectroscopic Parallel Survey (WISP) uses the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) infrared grism capabilities to obtain slitless spectra of thousands of galaxies over a wide redshift range including the peak of star formation history of the Universe. We select a population of very strong emission-line galaxies with rest-frame equivalent widths higher than 200 A. A total of 176 objects are found over the redshift range 0.35 < z < 2.3 in the 180 arcmin^2 area we analyzed so far. After estimating the AGN fraction in the sample, we show that this population consists of young and low-mass starbursts with higher specific star formation rates than normal star-forming galaxies at any redshift. After spectroscopic follow-up of one of these galaxies with Keck/LRIS, we report the detection at z = 0.7 of an extremely metal-poor galaxy with 12+Log(O/H)= 7.47 +- 0.11. The nebular…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
