The complexity of admissible rules of {\L}ukasiewicz logic
Emil Je\v{r}\'abek

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining whether inference rules are admissible in infinite-valued { extL}ukasiewicz logic is PSPACE-complete, establishing the computational complexity as optimal and contrasting it with the coNP-completeness of derivable rules.
Contribution
The paper establishes the PSPACE-completeness of admissibility in { extL}ukasiewicz logic, confirming the computational complexity as optimal and providing a complexity classification.
Findings
Admissibility in { extL}ukasiewicz logic is PSPACE-complete.
Derivability in { extL}ukasiewicz logic is coNP-complete.
The PSPACE complexity result is optimal.
Abstract
We investigate the computational complexity of admissibility of inference rules in infinite-valued {\L}ukasiewicz propositional logic (\L). It was shown in [13] that admissibility in {\L} is checkable in PSPACE. We establish that this result is optimal, i.e., admissible rules of {\L} are PSPACE-complete. In contrast, derivable rules of {\L} are known to be coNP-complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
