Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information"
M. Montero, E. Martin-Martinez
TL;DR
This paper clarifies misconceptions in relativistic quantum information, defending previous work against criticism and discussing the validity of entanglement measures in the field.
Contribution
It refutes claims of flaws in prior research and clarifies misunderstandings about entanglement measures in relativistic quantum information.
Findings
The referenced work is free of flaws or mistakes.
Criticism was based on a misunderstanding of the original work.
Entanglement measures remain valid tools in relativistic quantum information.
Abstract
We show that, contrarily to the claims in [K. Bradler, (2011), arXiv:1108.5553] (and arXiv:1201.1045), the reference [Phys. Rev. A 83, 062323 (2011)] is devoid of flaws or mistakes. We show that the criticism comes from a misunderstanding of part of our work. We also discuss the claims made in arXiv:1108.5553 about entanglement measures as a valid tool in relativistic quantum information.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.