Dissecting Photometric redshift for Active Galactic Nuclei using XMM- and Chandra-COSMOS samples
M. Salvato, O. Ilbert, G. Hasinger, A. Rau, F. Civano, G. Zamorani, M., Brusa, M. Elvis, C. Vignali, H. Aussel, A. Comastri, F. Fiore, E. Le Floc'h,, V. Mainieri, S. Bardelli, M. Bolzonella, A. Bongiorno, P. Capak, K. Caputi,, N. Cappelluti, C. M. Carollo, T. Contini, B. Garilli

TL;DR
This paper presents highly accurate photometric redshifts for X-ray sources in the COSMOS field, emphasizing the importance of source classification and deep photometry for improving redshift estimates of AGN.
Contribution
It introduces a method for selecting galaxy templates based on source properties to enhance photometric redshift accuracy for AGN in large surveys.
Findings
Achieved sigma_(Delta z/(1+z_spec)) 0.015 with 5.8% outliers for Chandra sources.
Revised photometric redshifts for XMM sources, with significant updates due to new deep H-band data.
Demonstrated the impact of source classification and photometric depth on redshift accuracy.
Abstract
With this paper, we release accurate photometric redshifts for 1692 counterparts to Chandra sources in the central square degree of the COSMOS field. The availability of a large training set of spectroscopic redshifts that extends to faint magnitudes enabled photometric redshifts comparable to the highest quality results presently available for normal galaxies. We demonstrate that morphologically extended, faint X-ray sources without optical variability are more accurately described by a library of normal galaxies (corrected for emission lines) than by AGN-dominated templates, even if these sources have AGN-like X-ray luminosities. Preselecting the library on the bases of the source properties allowed us to reach an accuracy sigma_(Delta z/(1+z_spec)) \sim0.015 with a fraction of outliers of 5.8% for the entire Chandra-COSMOS sample. In addition, we release revised photometric redshifts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
