The stellar masses and specific star-formation rates of submillimetre galaxies
Micha{\l} J. Micha{\l}owski (1), James S. Dunlop (1), Michele, Cirasuolo (1), Jens Hjorth (2), Christopher C. Hayward (3), Darach Watson (2), ((1) IfA Edinburgh, (2) DARK Copenhagen, (3) CfA, Harvard)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the stellar masses and specific star-formation rates of submillimetre galaxies, revealing that their average stellar mass is around 2x10^11 solar masses and they are part of the main sequence of star-forming galaxies at high redshift.
Contribution
The study clarifies how different analysis assumptions affect stellar mass estimates of SMGs and establishes a more consistent average stellar mass and sSFR for these galaxies.
Findings
Average stellar mass of SMGs is ~2x10^11 solar masses.
SMGs have sSFR comparable to other high-redshift star-forming galaxies.
SMGs are part of the main sequence, not extreme outliers.
Abstract
Establishing the stellar masses (M*), and hence specific star-formation rates (sSFRs) of submillimetre galaxies (SMGs) is crucial for determining their role in the cosmic galaxy/star formation. However, there is as yet no consensus over the typical M* of SMGs. Specifically, even for the same set of SMGs, the reported average M* have ranged over an order of magnitude, from ~5x10^10 Mo to ~5x10^11 Mo. Here we study how different methods of analysis can lead to such widely varying results. We find that, contrary to recent claims in the literature, potential contamination of IRAC 3-8 um photometry from hot dust associated with an active nucleus is not the origin of the published discrepancies in derived M*. Instead, we expose in detail how inferred M* depends on assumptions made in the photometric fitting, and quantify the individual and cumulative effects of different choices of initial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
