Warum Astrologie nicht funktionieren kann
Florian Freistetter

TL;DR
This paper critically examines astrology and demonstrates that its foundational assumptions lack a consistent, verifiable basis, rendering astrological methods arbitrary and ineffective.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis showing that all astrological systems lack a coherent, testable foundation, thus proving astrology does not work.
Findings
No consistent basis for astrological rules
Astrological interpretations are arbitrary
Astrology cannot be empirically validated
Abstract
There exists many different versions of astrology that are different from each other and sometimes even in conflict with each other. But the basis of every astrological system is the assumption of a connection between the motion of celestial bodies and the fate of man. An analysis of the methods of astrology shows that - regardless of which special system is used - there exists no consistent basis that allows to deduce general and verifiable rules. An astrological analysis is therefore always arbitrary and meaningless. Astrology does not work. ----- Astrologie existiert in vielen verschiedenen Versionen die sich oft deutliche voneinander unterscheiden und sogar widersprechen. Allen gemeinsam ist aber die grundlegende Annahme eines Zusammenhangs zwischen der Bewegung der Himmelsk\"orper und dem Schicksal der Menschen. Eine Analyse der astrologischen Methodik zeigt, dass sie - egal in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices
