
TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between dominance and $ $-height in Coxeter groups, revealing that $ $-height equals the number of positive roots dominated by a reflection, and applies this to study imaginary cones.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between $ $-height and the count of dominated positive roots, linking two concepts in Coxeter group theory and applying this to imaginary cone analysis.
Findings
$ $-height of a reflection equals the number of dominated positive roots
Finite $ $-height sets are finite for finite rank Coxeter groups
Applications to the structure of imaginary cones in Coxeter groups
Abstract
Brink and Howlett have introduced a partial ordering, called dominance, on the positive roots in the Tits realization of Coxeter groups (Math. Ann. 296 (1993), 179--190). Recently a concept called -height is introduced to each reflection in an arbitrary Coxeter group (Edgar, Dominance and regularity in Coxeter groups, PhD thesis, 2009). It is known (Dyer, unpublished) that for all of finite rank, and for each non-negative , the set of reflections of -height equal to is finite. However, it is not clear that the concepts of -height and dominance are related. Here we show that the -height of an arbitrary reflection is equal to the number of positive roots strictly dominated by the positive root corresponding to that reflection. We also give applications of dominance to the study of imaginary cones of Coxeter groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
