Spectral and Photometric Diagnostics of Giant Planet Formation Scenarios

TL;DR

This paper models the observable differences between giant planets formed via core accretion and disk instability, focusing on initial entropy effects on luminosity, spectra, and evolution to aid in distinguishing formation mechanisms.

Contribution

It introduces a broad set of 'Warm Start' models exploring how initial conditions influence observable properties of giant planets over time.

Findings

Hottest-start models are significantly brighter than coldest-start models in early years.

Infrared bands H and K are most effective in diagnosing initial formation conditions.

Differences in luminosity and spectra persist longer in more massive planets.

Abstract

Gas-giant planets that form via core accretion might have very different characteristics from those that form via disk-instability. Disk-instability objects are typically thought to have higher entropies, larger radii, and (generally) higher effective temperatures than core-accretion objects. We provide a large set of models exploring the observational consequences of high-entropy (hot) and low-entropy (cold) initial conditions, in the hope that this will ultimately help to distinguish between different physical mechanisms of planet formation. However, the exact entropies and radii of newly-formed planets due to these two modes of formation cannot, at present, be precisely predicted. We introduce a broad range of "Warm Start" gas-giant planet models. Between the hottest and the coldest models that we consider, differences in radii, temperatures, luminosities, and spectra persist for only a few million to a few tens of millions of years for planets that are a few times Jupiter's mass or less. For planets that are ~five times Jupiter's mass or more, significant differences between hottest-start and coldest-start models persist for on the order of 100 Myrs. We find that out of the standard infrared bands (J, H, K, L', M, N) the K and H bands are the most diagnostic of the initial conditions. A hottest-start model can be from ~4.5 magnitudes brighter (at Jupiter's mass) to ~9 magnitudes brighter (at ten times Jupiter's mass) than a coldest-start model in the first few million years. In more massive objects, these large differences in luminosity and spectrum persist for much longer than in less massive objects. We consider the influence of atmospheric conditions on spectra, and find that the presence or absence of clouds, and the metallicity of an atmosphere, can affect an object's apparent brightness in different bands by up to several magnitudes.