Minimalist Grammars and Minimalist Categorial Grammars, definitions toward inclusion of generated languages
Maxime Amblard (LORIA)

TL;DR
This paper formalizes Minimalist Grammars and Minimalist Categorial Grammars, providing definitions and exploring their language inclusion, aiming to unify syntactic frameworks with semantic integration.
Contribution
It offers formal definitions for MG and MCG and initiates the proof of language inclusion between these two grammatical frameworks.
Findings
Definitions of MG and MCG provided
First steps towards proving language inclusion
Frameworks facilitate syntax-semantics integration
Abstract
Stabler proposes an implementation of the Chomskyan Minimalist Program, Chomsky 95 with Minimalist Grammars - MG, Stabler 97. This framework inherits a long linguistic tradition. But the semantic calculus is more easily added if one uses the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Minimalist Categorial Grammars - MCG, based on an extension of the Lambek calculus, the mixed logic, were introduced to provide a theoretically-motivated syntax-semantics interface, Amblard 07. In this article, we give full definitions of MG with algebraic tree descriptions and of MCG, and take the first steps towards giving a proof of inclusion of their generated languages.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
