Same-sign trileptons at the LHC: a window to lepton-number violating supersymmetry
Satyanarayan Mukhopadhyay, Biswarup Mukhopadhyaya

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that same-sign trilepton and four-lepton signals at the LHC can effectively probe lepton-number violating supersymmetry, providing a background-free signature to distinguish R-parity violation and extract underlying SUSY properties.
Contribution
The study extends previous analyses by considering minimal supergravity and phenomenological SUSY models, showing large event rates for R-parity violating scenarios at 7 and 14 TeV, and introduces variables to determine the Majorana nature of neutralinos.
Findings
Large event rates predicted for R-parity violating SUSY at LHC energies.
Same-sign trilepton and four-lepton channels are effectively background-free.
Variables proposed can determine the Majorana character of neutralinos independently of production cross-sections.
Abstract
We present a detailed investigation to establish that lepton-number (L) violating supersymmetry (SUSY) can be effectively probed at the LHC in the practically background-free same-sign trilepton (SS3l) and same-sign four-lepton (SS4l) channels. With this in view, we extend our earlier analysis of SS3l and SS4l signals by considering situations based on minimal supergravity as well as a phenomenological SUSY model. We find that the R-parity violating scenario predicts large event rates, for both the 7 and 14 TeV runs. Furthermore, we show that it is extremely unlikely to ever achieve similar rates in R-parity conserving SUSY. In addition, we show how SS3l and SS4l, in conjunction with the mixed-sign trilepton and four-lepton channels, can be used to extract dynamical information about the underlying SUSY theory, namely, the Majorana character of the decaying lightest neutralino and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
