If physics is an information science, what is an observer?
Chris Fields

TL;DR
This paper explores how replacing the traditional quantum observer with a classical automaton-based observer can still produce quantum-like observations, suggesting a new perspective on the role of observers in quantum theory.
Contribution
It demonstrates that classical automaton-like observers can generate quantum-like measurement outcomes under reasonable physical assumptions.
Findings
Observers with classical automaton properties produce quantum-like observations
Quantum characteristics emerge without specific physical assumptions about the observer
Challenges traditional views of the observer's role in quantum mechanics
Abstract
Interpretations of quantum theory have traditionally assumed a "Galilean" observer, a bare "point of view" implemented physically by a quantum system. This paper investigates the consequences of replacing such an informationally-impoverished observer with an observer that satisfies the requirements of classical automata theory, i.e. an observer that encodes sufficient prior information to identify the system being observed and recognize its acceptable states. It shows that with reasonable assumptions about the physical dynamics of information channels, the observations recorded by such an observer will display the typical characteristics predicted by quantum theory, without requiring any specific assumptions about the observer's physical implementation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
