Biological Observer-Participation and Wheeler's 'Law without Law'
Brian D. Josephson

TL;DR
This paper proposes a philosophical shift towards viewing biological processes as fundamental, using semiotics and Circular Theory, to naturally explain Wheeler's observer-participation and emergent laws in nature.
Contribution
It introduces a novel perspective that integrates semiotics and Circular Theory to explain observer-participation and emergent laws without relying solely on quantitative methods.
Findings
Biological processes are more fundamental than traditional quantitative approaches.
Wheeler's observer-participation arises naturally in this framework.
Meaning plays a fundamental role in understanding nature, beyond quantitative science.
Abstract
It is argued that at a sufficiently deep level the conventional quantitative approach to the study of nature faces difficult problems, and that biological processes should be seen as more fundamental, in a way that can be elaborated on the basis of Peircean semiotics and Yardley's Circular Theory. In such a world-view, Wheeler's observer-participation and emergent law arise naturally, rather than having to be imposed artificially. This points the way to a deeper understanding of nature, where meaning has a fundamental role to play that is invisible to quantitative science.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
