Mechanism Design via Consensus Estimates, Cross Checking, and Profit Extraction
Bach Q. Ha, Jason D. Hartline

TL;DR
This paper extends a prior-free mechanism design technique using consensus estimates and cross-checking to more complex environments, aiming to improve simplicity and optimality over existing random sampling methods.
Contribution
It generalizes the consensus technique to complex, structurally rich environments like combinatorial auctions, enhancing prior-free mechanism design.
Findings
Generalized consensus technique to complex environments
Improved analysis and potential optimality of mechanisms
Applicable to single-minded combinatorial auctions
Abstract
There is only one technique for prior-free optimal mechanism design that generalizes beyond the structurally benevolent setting of digital goods. This technique uses random sampling to estimate the distribution of agent values and then employs the Bayesian optimal mechanism for this estimated distribution on the remaining players. Though quite general, even for digital goods, this random sampling auction has a complicated analysis and is known to be suboptimal. To overcome these issues we generalize the consensus technique from Goldberg and Hartline (2003) to structurally rich environments that include, e.g., single-minded combinatorial auctions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
