
TL;DR
This paper proves that approximating sparse representations of signals is computationally hard, especially when maximizing the projection norm, under standard complexity assumptions, highlighting fundamental limits of algorithmic solutions.
Contribution
It introduces a new hardness result for sparse approximation based on a different measure of solution quality, extending understanding of the problem's computational difficulty.
Findings
Establishes multiplicative inapproximability under complexity assumptions.
Derives additive inapproximability for the standard measure.
Quantifies the hardness even when the optimal approximation perfectly matches the signal.
Abstract
Given a redundant dictionary , represented by an matrix () and a target signal , the \emph{sparse approximation problem} asks to find an approximate representation of using a linear combination of at most atoms. In this paper, a new complexity theoretic hardness result for sparse approximation problem is presented via considering a different measure of quality for the solution. It is argued that, from an algorithmic standpoint, the problem is more meaningful if it asks to maximize the norm of the target signal's projection onto the selected atoms which are represented by column vectors. Then, a multiplicative inapproximability result is established with this new measure, under a reasonable complexity theoretic assumption. This result in turn implies additive inapproximability for the problem with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
