Is Strong SASI Activity the Key to Successful Neutrino-Driven Supernova Explosions?
Florian Hanke, Andreas Marek, Bernhard Mueller, and Hans-Thomas Janka, (MPI for Astrophysics, Garching)

TL;DR
This study investigates the role of SASI activity and dimensional effects in neutrino-driven supernova explosions, finding that large-scale SASI motions support explosions, with differences observed between 2D and 3D models related to turbulence and energy cascade.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of 1D, 2D, and 3D supernova models, highlighting the importance of SASI activity and turbulence effects on explosion conditions.
Findings
2D models explode more easily with better angular resolution
3D models show less favorable conditions for explosion due to turbulence
Large-scale SASI motions support shock expansion and explosion readiness
Abstract
Following a simulation approach of recent publications we explore the viability of the neutrino-heating explosion mechanism in dependence on the spatial dimension. Our results disagree with previous findings. While we also observe that two-dimensional (2D) models explode for lower driving neutrino luminosity than spherically symmetric (1D) models, we do not find that explosions in 3D occur easier and earlier than in 2D. Moreover, we find that the average entropy of matter in the gain layer hardly depends on the dimension and thus is no good diagnostic quantity for the readiness to explode. Instead, mass, integrated entropy, total neutrino-heating rate, and nonradial kinetic energy in the gain layer are higher when models are closer to explosion. Coherent, large-scale mass motions as typically associated with the standing accretion-shock instability (SASI) are observed to be supportive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
