On sub-determinants and the diameter of polyhedra
Nicolas Bonifas, Marco Di Summa, Friedrich Eisenbrand, Nicolai, H\"ahnle, Martin Niemeier

TL;DR
This paper establishes new polynomial upper bounds on the diameter of polyhedra based on sub-determinants of the defining matrix, improving previous bounds significantly.
Contribution
It introduces tighter bounds on polyhedron diameters related to sub-determinants, especially for totally unimodular matrices, advancing understanding in polyhedral combinatorics.
Findings
New upper bounds on polyhedron diameter polynomial in n and Δ
Bounds are tighter than previous results by Dyer and Frieze
Special case bounds for totally unimodular matrices
Abstract
We derive a new upper bound on the diameter of a polyhedron P = {x \in R^n : Ax <= b}, where A \in Z^{m\timesn}. The bound is polynomial in n and the largest absolute value of a sub-determinant of A, denoted by \Delta. More precisely, we show that the diameter of P is bounded by O(\Delta^2 n^4 log n\Delta). If P is bounded, then we show that the diameter of P is at most O(\Delta^2 n^3.5 log n\Delta). For the special case in which A is a totally unimodular matrix, the bounds are O(n^4 log n) and O(n^3.5 log n) respectively. This improves over the previous best bound of O(m^16 n^3 (log mn)^3) due to Dyer and Frieze.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPoint processes and geometric inequalities · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
