Renormalization persistency of tensor force in nuclei
Naofumi Tsunoda, Takaharu Otsuka, Koshiroh Tsukiyama, Morten, Hjorth-Jensen

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the tensor component of effective nuclear interactions remains largely unchanged through renormalization procedures, a property termed 'Renormalization Persistency', with significant implications for nuclear structure modeling.
Contribution
It introduces and provides evidence for the 'Renormalization Persistency' of the tensor force in nuclear effective interactions, a novel insight into the stability of tensor contributions after renormalization.
Findings
Tensor-force contribution to the monopole term is nearly unchanged after renormalization.
Renormalization persistency is observed primarily in the tensor force, not in the central force.
This property holds across different renormalization methods and shell-model spaces.
Abstract
In this work we analyze the tensor-force component of effective interactions appropriate for nuclear shell-model studies, with particular emphasis on the monopole term of the interactions. Standard nucleon-nucleon () interactions such as AV8' and NLO are tailored to shell-model studies by employing techniques to handle the short-range repulsion of the interactions and by applying many-body perturbation theory to incorporate in-medium effects. We show, via numerical studies of effective interactions for the and shells, that the tensor-force contribution to the monopole term of the effective interaction is barely changed by these renormalization procedures, resulting in almost the same monopole term as the one of the bare interactions. We propose to call this feature {\it Renormalization Persistency} of the tensor force, as it is a remarkable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
