No-signaling, perfect bipartite dichotomic correlations and local randomness
M.P. Seevinck

TL;DR
This paper reviews no-signaling constraints, derives new inequalities to distinguish no-signaling correlations from general ones, and shows that perfect correlations imply local randomness under no-signaling, with potential cryptographic implications.
Contribution
It introduces a novel set of no-signaling inequalities resembling CHSH and demonstrates their implications for local randomness in perfect correlations.
Findings
New no-signaling inequalities close to CHSH are derived.
Existing inequalities by Roy, Singh, Avis are shown to be trivial.
Perfect correlations under no-signaling imply local randomness for identical devices.
Abstract
The no-signaling constraint on bi-partite correlations is reviewed. It is shown that in order to obtain non-trivial Bell-type inequalities that discern no-signaling correlations from more general ones, one must go beyond considering expectation values of products of observables only. A new set of nontrivial no-signaling inequalities is derived which have a remarkably close resemblance to the CHSH inequality, yet are fundamentally different. A set of inequalities by Roy and Singh and Avis et al., which is claimed to be useful for discerning no-signaling correlations, is shown to be trivially satisfied by any correlation whatsoever. Finally, using the set of newly derived no-signaling inequalities a result with potential cryptographic consequences is proven: if different parties use identical devices, then, once they have perfect correlations at spacelike separation between dichotomic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
