Measuring the level of nuclear activity in Seyfert galaxies and the unification scheme
Veeresh Singh (1), Prajval Shastri (1), Guido Risaliti (2,3) ((1), Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India, (2) INAF-Osservatorio di, Arcetri, Firenze, Italy, (3) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,, Cambridge, MA, USA)

TL;DR
This study tests the Seyfert galaxy unification scheme by comparing intrinsic nuclear properties of type 1 and type 2 Seyferts, finding they are statistically similar, supporting the orientation-based unification model.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive statistical comparison of intrinsic properties of Seyfert subtypes, confirming the unification scheme with matched samples.
Findings
Similar distributions of X-ray luminosities for both Seyfert types
Equivalent bolometric luminosities and black hole masses
Both subtypes accrete at sub-Eddington rates
Abstract
Context: The unification scheme of Seyfert galaxies hypothesizes that Seyfert type 1s and type 2s are intrinsically similar and the observed differences between the two subtypes are solely due to the differing orientations of toroidal-shaped obscuring material around the AGN. In the framework of the unification scheme, both the Seyfert subtypes are expected to show similar intrinsic nuclear properties, such as the absorption-corrected AGN X-ray luminosity, bolometric luminosity, accretion rate and the mass of the supermassive black hole. Aims: To test the predictions of the Seyfert unification scheme, we make statistical comparison of the distributions of: (i) the absorption-corrected 2.0 - 10 keV X-ray luminosities, (ii) the bolometric luminosities, (iii) the black hole masses and, (iv) the Eddington ratios, of Seyfert type 1s and type 2s. Methods: We use an optically selected Seyfert…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
