Spectroscopic characterization of the atmospheres of potentially habitable planets: GL 581 d as a model case study
Philip von Paris, Juan Cabrera, Mareike Godolt, J. Lee Grenfell,, Pascal Hedelt, Heike Rauer, Franz Schreier, Barbara Stracke

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopic models to assess the detectability of atmospheric features and habitability indicators on the potentially habitable exoplanet GL 581 d, highlighting observational challenges and potential false positives.
Contribution
It provides a detailed simulation framework for spectroscopic characterization of habitable exoplanets and discusses the limitations and ambiguities in interpreting atmospheric signals.
Findings
Water and CO2 absorption bands are detectable in synthetic spectra.
Surface temperatures can be inferred in optically thin spectral windows.
CO2 absorption can cause false positives or negatives in biomarker detection.
Abstract
(abridged) The Super-Earth candidate GL 581 d is the first potentially habitable extrasolar planet. Therefore, GL 581 d is used to illustrate a hypothetical detailed spectroscopic characterization of such planets. Atmospheric profiles from 1D radiative-convective model scenarios of GL 581 d were used to calculate high-resolution synthetic spectra. From the spectra, signal-to-noise ratios were calculated for a telescope such as the planned James Webb Space Telescope. The presence of the model atmospheres could be clearly inferred from the calculated synthetic spectra due to strong water and carbon dioxide absorption bands. Surface temperatures could be inferred for model scenarios with optically thin spectral windows. Dense, CO2-rich scenarios did not allow for the characterization of surface temperatures and to assess habitability. Degeneracies between CO2 concentration and surface…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
