Finite-Repetition threshold for infinite ternary words
Golnaz Badkobeh (King's College London), Maxime Crochemore (King's, College London)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the finite-repetition threshold for infinite words over ternary alphabets, establishing exact values for three-letter alphabets and conjecturing results for larger alphabets, advancing understanding of repetition constraints.
Contribution
It precisely determines the finite-repetition threshold for ternary alphabets and proposes conjectures for larger alphabets, refining the understanding of repetition limits in infinite words.
Findings
FRt(3)=7/4, equal to r(3), with minimal 2 factors
Achieved the bound with an infinite word containing only two 7/4-exponent factors
Conjecture that FRt(4)=7/5, remains open for larger alphabets
Abstract
The exponent of a word is the ratio of its length over its smallest period. The repetitive threshold r(a) of an a-letter alphabet is the smallest rational number for which there exists an infinite word whose finite factors have exponent at most r(a). This notion was introduced in 1972 by Dejean who gave the exact values of r(a) for every alphabet size a as it has been eventually proved in 2009. The finite-repetition threshold for an a-letter alphabet refines the above notion. It is the smallest rational number FRt(a) for which there exists an infinite word whose finite factors have exponent at most FRt(a) and that contains a finite number of factors with exponent r(a). It is known from Shallit (2008) that FRt(2)=7/3. With each finite-repetition threshold is associated the smallest number of r(a)-exponent factors that can be found in the corresponding infinite word. It has been…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
