Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
The Fermi-LAT Collaboration: M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Albert, W. B., Atwood, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, G. Barbiellini, D. Bastieri, K. Bechtol, R., Bellazzini, B. Berenji, R. D. Blandford, E. D. Bloom, E. Bonamente, A. W., Borgland, J. Bregeon, M. Brigida, P. Bruel, R. Buehler

TL;DR
This study uses Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data from 10 Milky Way satellite galaxies to set upper limits on dark matter annihilation, constraining models without relying on boost factors.
Contribution
First gamma-ray analysis combining multiple satellites to robustly limit dark matter annihilation cross sections without extra assumptions.
Findings
No dark matter signal detected in the data.
Established upper limits on annihilation cross sections from 1e-26 to 5e-23 cm^3 s^-1.
Ruled out generic s-wave dark matter models at 95% confidence level.
Abstract
Satellite galaxies of the Milky Way are among the most promising targets for dark matter searches in gamma rays. We present a search for dark matter consisting of weakly interacting massive particles, applying a joint likelihood analysis to 10 satellite galaxies with 24 months of data of the Fermi Large Area Telescope. No dark matter signal is detected. Including the uncertainty in the dark matter distribution, robust upper limits are placed on dark matter annihilation cross sections. The 95% confidence level upper limits range from about 1e-26 cm^3 s^-1 at 5 GeV to about 5e-23 cm^3 s^-1 at 1 TeV, depending on the dark matter annihilation final state. For the first time, using gamma rays, we are able to rule out models with the most generic cross section (~3e-26 cm^3 s^-1 for a purely s-wave cross section), without assuming additional boost factors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
