Mach's Principle: A Response to Mashhoon and Wesson's Paper arXiv: 1106.6036
Julian Barbour

TL;DR
This paper defends Einstein's general relativity as consistent with Mach's principle, clarifying misconceptions and emphasizing the importance of the origin of inertial frames over mere motion descriptions.
Contribution
It provides a reinterpretation of Mach's principle within general relativity, countering claims that Einstein's theory neglects Mach's ideas.
Findings
General relativity incorporates Mach's principle when properly understood.
The origin of inertial frames is central to Mach's principle, not just motion.
Misconceptions about Einstein's theory and Mach's principle are addressed.
Abstract
In their recent "Mach's principle and higher-dimensional dynamics", Mashhoon and Wesson argue that Mach's principle is not properly incorporated into general relativity and that in Einstein's theory "the origin of inertia remains essentially the same as in Newtonian physics." While it is true that the motion of a single test particle in a Newtonian inertial frame of reference appears essentially the same as in an Einsteinian local inertial frame, this misses the point. The issue is not what motion looks like in an inertial frame of reference but what is the origin of the inertial frame. Unlike Newtonian dynamics, general relativity does implement Mach's principle when considered from this correctly formulated point of view.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
