Searches for periodic neutrino emission from binary systems with 22 and 40 strings of IceCube
IceCube Collaboration: R. Abbasi, Y. Abdou, T. Abu-Zayyad, M., Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. M. Allen, D. Altmann, K., Andeen, J. Auffenberg, X. Bai, M. Baker, S. W. Barwick, R. Bay, J. L. Bazo, Alba, K. Beattie, J. J. Beatty, S. Bechet, J. K. Becker

TL;DR
This study searches for periodic neutrino signals from binary systems using IceCube data, but finds no significant evidence, setting upper limits on neutrino fluxes and demonstrating the analysis's sensitivity improvements for short emission durations.
Contribution
The paper introduces a method to search for periodic neutrino emission with fixed photon-observed periods, optimizing sensitivity for brief emission phases, using IceCube data from 22 and 40-string configurations.
Findings
No significant neutrino emission detected from the binary systems.
The strongest excess was 2.1 sigma for Cygnus X-3.
Upper limits on neutrino flux were established for all sources.
Abstract
In this paper we present the results of searches for periodic neutrino emission from a catalog of binary systems. Such modulation, observed in the photon flux, would be caused by the geometry of these systems. In the analysis, the period is fixed by these photon observations, while the phase and duration of the neutrino emission are treated as free parameters to be fit with the data. If the emission occurs during ~20% or less of the total period, this analysis achieves better sensitivity than a time-integrated analysis. We use the IceCube data taken from May 31, 2007 to April 5, 2008 with its 22-string configuration, and from April 5, 2008 to May 20, 2009 with its 40-string configuration. No evidence for neutrino emission is found, with the strongest excess occurring for Cygnus X-3 at 2.1 sigma significance after accounting for trials. Neutrino flux upper limits for both periodic and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
