Simulation study of the impact of AGIPD design choices on X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy utilizing the intensity autocorrelation technique
Julian Becker, Christian Gutt, Heinz Graafsma

TL;DR
This study uses simulations to evaluate how different AGIPD detector design choices affect the quality of X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy data, focusing on pixel size, aperturing, and noise effects at XFEL.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of detector pixel sizes and aperturing strategies, revealing optimal configurations for XPCS experiments at XFELs.
Findings
Aperturing is not beneficial at low intensities but improves data quality at higher intensities.
Smaller pixels (100 μm) outperform larger ones (200 μm) when intensity exceeds 0.05 photons per (100 μm)^2.
Detector design influences signal-to-noise ratio and correlation accuracy, with differences less than a factor of 3.
Abstract
The European XFEL, currently under construction, will produce a coherent X-ray pulse every 222 ns in pulse trains of up to 2700 pulses. In conjunction with the fast 2D area detectors currently under development, it will be possible to perform X-ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (XPCS) experiments on sub-microsecond timescales with non-ergodic systems. A case study for the Adaptive Gain Integrating Pixel Detector (AGIPD) at the European XFEL employing the intensity autocorrelation technique was performed using the detector simulation tool HORUS. As optimum results from XPCS experiments are obtained when the pixel size approximates the (small) speckle size, the presented study compares the AGIPD (pixel size of (200 m)) to a possible apertured version of the detector and to a hypothetical system with (100 m) pixel size and investigates the influence of intensity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
