Non-existence of periodic solutions in fractional-order dynamical systems and a remarkable difference between integer and fractional-order derivatives of periodic functions
Eva Kaslik, Seenith Sivasundaram

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that fractional-order derivatives of periodic functions cannot be periodic, leading to the non-existence of exact periodic solutions in many fractional-order dynamical systems, contrasting with integer-order cases.
Contribution
It proves the non-existence of exact periodic solutions in fractional-order systems using Mellin transform and analyzes implications for neural network models.
Findings
Fractional derivatives of periodic functions are not periodic.
Exact periodic solutions do not exist in a broad class of fractional systems.
Numerical limit cycles in fractional neural networks are not truly periodic.
Abstract
Using the Mellin transform approach, it is shown that, in contrast with integer-order derivatives, the fractional-order derivative of a periodic function cannot be a function with the same period. The three most widely used definitions of fractional-order derivatives are taken into account, namely, the Caputo, Riemann-Liouville and Grunwald-Letnikov definitions. As a consequence, the non-existence of exact periodic solutions in a wide class of fractional-order dynamical systems is obtained. As an application, it is emphasized that the limit cycle observed in numerical simulations of a simple fractional-order neural network cannot be an exact periodic solution of the system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
