The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: measuring the cosmic expansion history using the Alcock-Paczynski test and distant supernovae
Chris Blake, Karl Glazebrook, Tamara Davis, Sarah Brough, Matthew, Colless, Carlos Contreras, Warrick Couch, Scott Croom, Michael J. Drinkwater,, Karl Forster, David Gilbank, Mike Gladders, Ben Jelliffe, Russell J. Jurek,, I-hui Li, Barry Madore, Chris Martin, Kevin Pimbblet

TL;DR
This paper combines supernovae data and galaxy clustering analysis from the WiggleZ survey to measure the universe's expansion history, providing evidence for acceleration and consistency with a cosmological constant.
Contribution
It presents a new, non-parametric measurement of the cosmic expansion rate over redshifts 0.1 to 0.9 using the Alcock-Paczynski test and supernovae data, independent of cosmological models.
Findings
Confirmed the universe's acceleration in expansion.
Measured the Hubble rate with 10-15% precision in four redshift bins.
Results are consistent with a cosmological-constant dark energy.
Abstract
Astronomical observations suggest that today's Universe is dominated by a dark energy of unknown physical origin. One of the most notable consequences in many models is that dark energy should cause the expansion of the Universe to accelerate: but the expansion rate as a function of time has proven very difficult to measure directly. We present a new determination of the cosmic expansion history by combining distant supernovae observations with a geometrical analysis of large-scale galaxy clustering within the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey, using the Alcock-Paczynski test to measure the distortion of standard spheres. Our result constitutes a robust and non-parametric measurement of the Hubble expansion rate as a function of time, which we measure with 10-15% precision in four bins within the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.9. We demonstrate that the cosmic expansion is accelerating, in a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
