Is there a black hole in NGC 4382?
Kayhan Gultekin, Douglas O. Richstone, Karl Gebhardt, S. M. Faber, Tod, R. Lauer, Ralf Bender, John Kormendy, Jason Pinkney

TL;DR
This study uses HST observations and axisymmetric models to estimate the black hole mass in NGC 4382, finding it consistent with no black hole and discussing implications for galaxy relations and nuclear activity.
Contribution
First detailed black hole mass estimate in NGC 4382 using HST data and axisymmetric modeling, highlighting potential deviations from established galaxy-black hole relations.
Findings
Black hole mass consistent with zero within uncertainties
Upper limit aligns with M-σ relation predictions
Nucleus shows a double structure suggesting a stellar disk
Abstract
We present HST STIS observations of the galaxy NGC 4382 (M85) and axisymmetric models of the galaxy to determine mass-to-light ration (M/L, V-band) and central black hole mass (M_BH). We find M/L = 3.74 +/- 0.1 (solar units) and M_BH = 1.3 (+5.2, -1.2) \times 10^7 M_sun at an assumed distance of 17.9 Mpc, consistent with no black hole. The upper limit, M_BH < 9.6 \times 10^7 M_sun (2{\sigma}) or M_BH < 1.4 \times 10^8 M_sun (3{\sigma}) is consistent with the current M-{\sigma} relation, which predicts M_BH = 8.8 \times 10^7 M_sun at {\sigma}_e = 182 km/s, but low for the current M-L relation, which predicts M_BH = 7.8 \times 10^8 M_sun at L_V = 8.9 \times 10^10 L_sun,V. HST images show the nucleus to be double, suggesting the presence of a nuclear eccentric stellar disk, in analogy to the Tremaine disk in M31. This conclusion is supported by the HST velocity dispersion profile. Despite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
