Measurement of the top-quark mass in the lepton+jets channel using a matrix element technique with the CDF II detector
CDF Collaboration: T. Aaltonen, B. \'Alvarez Gonz\'alezv, S. Amerio,, D. Amidei, A. Anastassov, A. Annovi, J. Antos, G. Apollinari, J.A. Appel, A., Apresyan, T. Arisawa, A. Artikov, J. Asaadi, W. Ashmanskas, B. Auerbach, A., Aurisano, F. Azfar, W. Badgett, A. Barbaro-Galtieri

TL;DR
This paper measures the top-quark mass using a matrix element technique on Tevatron data, achieving a precise result by simultaneously calibrating jet energy scale with in situ methods.
Contribution
It introduces a novel unbinned likelihood approach that combines signal and background matrix elements with in situ jet energy calibration to improve top-quark mass measurement accuracy.
Findings
Top-quark mass measured as 172.4 GeV/c^2
Achieved combined statistical and JES uncertainty of 1.4 GeV/c^2
Total systematic uncertainty of 1.3 GeV/c^2
Abstract
A measurement of the top-quark mass is presented using Tevatron data from proton-antiproton collisions at center-of-mass energy TeV collected with the CDF II detector. Events are selected from a sample of candidates for production of pairs that decay into the lepton+jets channel. The top-quark mass is measured with an unbinned maximum likelihood method where the event probability density functions are calculated using signal and background matrix elements, as well as a set of parameterized jet-to-parton transfer functions. The likelihood function is maximized with respect to the top-quark mass, the signal fraction in the sample, and a correction to the jet energy scale (JES) calibration of the calorimeter jets. The simultaneous measurement of the JES correction () amounts to an additional \textit{in situ} jet energy calibration based on the known mass of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
