Search for the disappearance of muon antineutrinos in the NuMI neutrino beam
MINOS Collaboration: P. Adamson, D. J. Auty, D. S. Ayres, C., Backhouse, G. Barr, M. Bishai, A. Blake, G. J. Bock, D. J. Boehnlein, D., Bogert, S. V. Cao, S. Cavanaugh, D. Cherdack, S. Childress, B. C. Choudhary,, J. A. B. Coelho, S. J. Coleman, L. Corwin, D. Cronin-Hennessy

TL;DR
This paper presents constraints on muon antineutrino oscillation parameters using the MINOS detectors, measuring the antineutrino component of the NuMI beam and setting limits on the oscillation parameters at 90% confidence level.
Contribution
First measurement of muon antineutrino oscillation parameters using the NuMI beam with constraints derived from MINOS detector data.
Findings
130 observed events vs. 136.4 expected without oscillations
Upper limit on |dm2bar| < 3.37 x 10^-3 eV^2 at 90% CL
Constraints consistent with previous measurements of neutrino oscillations
Abstract
We report constraints on antineutrino oscillation parameters that were obtained by using the two MINOS detectors to measure the 7% muon antineutrino component of the NuMI neutrino beam. In the Far Detector, we select 130 events in the charged-current muon antineutrino sample, compared to a prediction of 136.4 +/- 11.7(stat) ^{+10.2}_{-8.9}(syst) events under the assumption |dm2bar|=2.32x10^-3 eV^2, snthetabar=1.0. Assuming no oscillations occur at the Near Detector baseline, a fit to the two-flavor oscillation approximation constrains |dm2bar|<3.37x10^-3 eV^2 at the 90% confidence level with snthetabar=1.0.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
