Spherically symmetric solutions, Newton's Law and IR limit \lambda->1, in Covariant Horava Lifshitz Gravity
Jean Alexandre, Pavlos Pasipoularides

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether spherically symmetric solutions in Covariant Horava-Lifshitz Gravity can recover Newtonian gravity in the IR limit, finding that it generally fails unless bb=1, and discusses alternative assumptions about auxiliary fields.
Contribution
It demonstrates that under common assumptions, the IR limit does not reproduce Newtonian physics unless bb=1, highlighting a limitation in Covariant Horava-Lifshitz Gravity.
Findings
Standard solutions do not recover Newtonian gravity as bbd1.
Recovery of Newtonian physics requires bb=1.
Discussion of alternative assumptions about auxiliary field A.
Abstract
In this note we examine whether spherically symmetric solutions in Covariant Horava Lifshitz Gravity can reproduce Newton's Law in the IR limit \lambda->1. We adopt the position that the auxiliary field A is independent of the space-time metric [10,11], and we assume, as in [4], that is a running coupling constant. We show that under these assumptions, spherically symmetric solutions fail to restore the standard Newtonian physics in the IR limit \lambda->1, unless \lambda does not run, and has the fixed value \lambda=1. Finally, we comment on the Horava and Melby Thompson approach [4] in which A is assumed as a part of the space-time metric in the IR.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
