Comment on "A de Haas-van Alphen study of the Fermi surfaces of superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs"
S.V. Borisenko, V. B. Zabolotnyy, D.V. Evtushinsky, T. K. Kim, I.V., Morozov, A. A. Kordyuk, B. B\"uchner

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the disagreement between de Haas-van Alphen measurements and ARPES results on LiFeAs, emphasizing the importance of accurate interpretation of experimental data in understanding its Fermi surface.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary correcting the misinterpretation of experimental data on LiFeAs's Fermi surface by previous studies.
Findings
Reveals the discrepancy between dHvA data and ARPES results.
Highlights the importance of careful data analysis in Fermi surface studies.
Corrects the understanding of LiFeAs's electronic structure.
Abstract
In a recent preprint Putzke et al. argued that their dHvA data on LiFeAs are in good agreement with DFT calculations and contradict our ARPES results. Here we show that the situation is just the opposite.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIron-based superconductors research
