Rich-club network topology to minimize synchronization cost due to phase difference among frequency-synchronized oscillators
Takamitsu Watanabe

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new measure of synchronization cost based on phase differences among oscillators and demonstrates that rich-club network topologies minimize this cost, enhancing network efficiency.
Contribution
It defines a novel synchronization cost metric and shows that rich-club network structures minimize this cost using the Kuramoto model and analytical insights.
Findings
Rich-club networks minimize synchronization cost.
Optimal networks have bimodal degree distributions.
Rich-club topology enhances synchronization efficiency.
Abstract
Functions of some networks, such as power grids and large-scale brain networks, rely on not only frequency synchronization, but also phase synchronization. Nevertheless, even after the oscillators reach to frequency-synchronized status, phase difference among oscillators often shows non-zero constant values. Such phase difference potentially results in inefficient transfer of power or information among oscillators, and avoid proper and efficient functioning of the network. In the present study, we newly define synchronization cost by the phase difference among the frequency-synchronized oscillators, and investigate the optimal network structure with the minimum synchronization cost through rewiring-based optimization. By using the Kuramoto model, we demonstrate that the cost is minimized in a network topology with rich-club organization, which comprises the densely-connected center…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
